View Single Post
Old 06-24-2011, 04:25 PM   #4
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
We're already beginning to see a decline in hp in the midsize segment as V6's are replaced by economy tuned turbocharged 4 bangers. That said ... 250-300 hp in those cars is a bit much, and a loss of 50 hp isn't going to be too much of a problem for most of those buyers.

That said, it won't be like the 70's, for a number of reasons. Back then, manufactures switched from SAE gross hp to SAE net hp. This meant that engines had to be tested as they were in the car (ie, with the emissions equipment, belt driven accessories, air filter, and everything else). That probably dropped hp ratings be 15-20% on most engines by itself. The actual output didn't change, they just began measuring it in a more honest manner. On top of that, you had emissions standards for the first time and they were pretty ambitious so manufacturers were forced to detune their engines substantially in order to be compliant.

Now, things are being driven by fuel economy. Sure, the manufacturers will probably revise the fuel map, go with less aggressive cam profiles, and go down a bit in displacement. But at the same time most cars will get lighter which will at least partially offset the drop in hp. Plus, technologies like direct injection & variable valve timing will become ever more common and improve both performance and fuel economy.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote