Quote:
Originally Posted by Milk 1027
Every single one of your posts is full of fallacies and bad arguments. You're arguing points that the OP didn't even talk about.
I got my 1SS for 31K so it is very possible to get a 2SS for 33K. The OP pointed out all the things that the SS has STANDARD vs the GT. In fact the 38K Mustang STILL doesn't have the the standard features the 1SS or even the LS have.
|
Okay.... The Camaro lacks a lot of stuff the Mustang has, what's your point ? Like a full glass sunroof ? You can't have that on the Camaro even if you wanted.... The Mustang is a cheaper car(that hasn't drastically changed since 2004 when the S197 debuted) in the first place. That's not a fallacy. It has less features, it costs less. That's not a fallacy. Hell, I don't even care. Haha, that might be why my arguement has holes in it. We are arguing about subjectivity, I was trying to through some solid objectivity into the arguement(price). Yet it was shot down.
Let's compare features on a Maserati GranTurismo to a BMW 128i. An extreme example, but the more expensive car will almost always have more features. Except for many BMW's, in which features like seat heaters, nav, power seats, or real leather are all optional.