|
I especially love the comments on Autoblog that blame his death on intoxication and not wearing a seatbelt. The intoxication wasnt to a degree of proper inhibition of the drivers abilities. the intoxication charge was called on a technicality of it being a teen, where any alcohol is considered illegal, even if it is well below the limits of being driver imparing side effects at .03%. so if it wasnt for his age he wouldnt have been called drunk. if he was wearing a seatbelt then yes he may have survived the accident. but if it wasnt for the vehicle safety issue there would have been no accident. my sympathy goes out to the Stewarts, and i hope they bring ramifacations for what happened to the highest degree. i hope they dont settle for just money and take it to higher courts to enact stricter and more public recall laws for all manufactures dealing in the states.
|