Quote:
Originally Posted by Muscle Master
Eh, it's just a matter of taste
personally, both design cues are in a league of their own
GM chose to have the Camaro more modern with a tad bit of the retro look, same goes for the interior
Chrysler chose the Challenger be a lot more retro while incorporating the modern look as well, can't say the same for the interior but hey it's all about taste
BTW- the rumor about the Evic timer is false, it's very accurate
|
Ya i agree with you 100% on the styling... they just chose to go in two directions. The challenger, is straight muscle car. Nothing modern about the styling at all, which is great for some people. Ive said it before, if the challenger was the same size as the older 1970's models, and weighed 3500lbs id be on that forum right now.
The Camaro imo is nicer. Its interior was more tastefully done, and the exterior matches the challengers while APPEARING quite a bit smaller.
However (and i really don't know about this one) when the mags first started testing the EVIC's i remember reading they were 'laughably off target'
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."