Quote:
Originally Posted by fbodfather
 times 10,000.................
Let me assure everyone that neither of those gentlemen were in any of our planning meetings.
Much ado about nothing.
Every program has its challenges, but this article is just way off........... |
Thanks for the reassurance, Fbodfather.
Really...if you read it (I mean actually READ it)...there's very little consistency or value to that "article". A couple of 'sources' who could be anything from the cleaning staff to imaginary friends...and some clearly made-up or criss-crossed facts and assumptions.
Seeing that the supposed Cadillac is still expected years away (According to multiple websites...)...it doesn't make much sense that anyone would get upset or write-off the company/car/platform over this silly writeup.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlingShot
I say bring back the Kappa platform ...
|
You mean the one that nearly cost more to make than it sold for? The tiny roadster with a 4-cylinder that weighed nearly as much as a Corvette with a V8?
Quote:
Originally Posted by toesuf94
If the RUMOR on the INTERNET is not signed JOE X, GM Engineering Tech Guru Extraordinaire... IGNORE IT!
This same information applies to the following auto manufacturers:
ALL OF THEM.
That is all.
|
GREAT Advice!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3
There is more mis and incorrect information in that article than any I've seen in quite a while.
Apparently "6 or 7 insiders" each giving just a bit of wrong information adds up to total credibility.
I call material that comes from the back end of a male cow.
|
More than usual??? From you that's saying A LOT.
And very eloquently stated!
