View Single Post
Old 05-17-2011, 01:05 PM   #65
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by gm2376 View Post
again, no denying that....but at the cost difference....its not on the same playing field. Put the gt500 against it, and see what happens. They keep saying the GT and SS are closest.....closest below cost.....lets put a few K over the cost and see what happens.
The thing you are missing is that the SS/GT is the the same difference under the SRT (comparing the same or similar equipment) as the GT500/ZL1 are above it. it falls in the middle and is not really a comparison with either. Hell, it offers features stock the Camaro does even have available, and when you option the Mustang to match it is not that much less expensive then the SRT-8. Also, i find the other post you made above pretty funny considering when Motor trend put the SS against the 2010 SRT-8 (not even the 2011 with much improved suspension and steering) they were pretty well even in handling abilities, so if the Challenger is a canoe, then the Camaro must be a dingy???? Also on the turning radius, there is a whopping .4 foot difference (37.7 for the Camaro and 38.1 for the Challenger).
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote