Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65
Indeed, they have, the EV1. There's a reason that program was canceled, despite the stupidity you might read regarding conspiracy theories between GM and oil companies.
The problem here is that Nissan didn't improve on the EV1. GM saw the shortcomings of a regular EV and that's why the Volt has a range extender. The Leaf gives you maybe 70 miles of range on a good day, the Volt gives you infinite range no matter what weather and road conditions you're driving through as long as you can find a gas station, just like every other car.
Basically Nissan hasn't been doing their homework, and consumers are quickly finding out what a shoddy job they did. If you're going to tout a car as a game-changer as Nissan has with the Leaf, then you better be damn well sure that the car performs up to spec, and the Leaf simply doesn't. It's a half-assed and impractical car rushed to production in an effort to beat the Volt to market. Nissan engineers themselves have said that they really needed more time to get the car right, but corporate refused to give them extra time. Now Nissan is feeling the effects as more and more news articles go online regarding highly inaccurate range calculations and stranded owners.
|
honestly what started this thing is the whole scare about us "running" out of oil and the wars over in the middle east. i dont think right now that we have a greater substitute for the energy that oil does provide. you can throw over a ton of batteries in it and its still going to run out and not be as efficient. im sorry but getting to 60 mph in 10 seconds is not improving anything and with mergering in highways and traffic already at speed and you are mashing this hybrid motor as hard as it will allow is going to cause servere problems. this alternative engery source wont do. why would we step down and use something less efficient when the whole idea is to come up with something "better" not just a substitute. just my two sense we can do better