Quote:
Originally Posted by syr74
Irony.
Compare a Corvette Z06 Carbon to a GT500 Performance Package and we would hear endlessly about how the Vette is obviously better because it's faster despite the significantly higher price tag.
Compare a Shelby GT350 to a Challenger SRT8 and the GT350 loses, despite being faster, because it costs too much.
I'm seeing bias, but it isn't coming from the car magazines. I expect to see bias against the Mustang, were on a Camaro forum and it's a part of the rivalry. What I don't understand is why folks feel obliged to explain away an opinion very obviously based almost entirely, if not entirely, in bias by creating facts to suit your argument.
I don't like chocolate ice cream, I feel no need to create conjured facts explaining why chocolate ice cream is inferior, I just say I don't like it.
|
The article compares a $40,000 car you can buy off the dealer's showroom floor to an $80,000 aftermarket tuner car. That strikes you as a logical comparison? The comparison you mention is equally as ridiculous due to the price disparity but at least they are both OEM cars.