|
It would probably only be expensive because they would add on a "recouping predicted future losses" tax to make up for the slump in sales Swazworth was talking about.
I'm sure the technology wasn't cheap... 20 years ago. However, as we've all seen even in just the past 5 years, technology cheapens fast! If it cost an extra $20,000 20 years ago, chances are the exact same technology would only be a sum of its parts by now if kept in production throughout.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastball
"Some legends just live in your dreams, others never let you sleep!"
|
|