Quote:
Originally Posted by garagelogic
That's like saying the Gen5 Camaro looks like a Malibu.  They Challenger and the Charger don't look even remotely similar. From the front, side or rear. Methinks you are just cutting on the Challenger because the OP bought one of them versus waiting on the Camaro.
|
Nah, in all honesty I couldn't tell if the guy at work had a challenger or a charger until i looked at the badging on it. They do look similar actually from the sides.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323
+1 the guy just despises dodge you can tell. the trany does go passed 50k.
stop living in the 80s.
|
Actually I got a co-worker who has a dodge mini van (2002) tranny went bad twice before 60k miles, my parents Durango (1999) the tranny went out @ 48k plus it had major lower ball joint issues but that just crappy durango. My sisters dodge ram went out at like 38-39k.
Im sure by now though Dodge has no problems but around those years (1999-2003) they were horrible.
I got nothing against Challenger, I liked the old Challenger a lot. (and Chevelle and Camaro and Mustang... lol)
__________________
Current Modifications: Your average Bolt-ons & Suspension Upgrades
GForce Engineering: 9" Rear End, Strange Pro Iron Case w/Moser Nodular 3.70:1 Detroit locker, 3.5" Solid Drive Shaft