Quote:
Originally Posted by KatarHol
When you look at the price...and then it's faster than similar performers(Camarocoughcough),why would you not take it seriously?
Is it the handling? Yes,the Camaro will handle better,but if you're going that route,why not get a STI,it's also just as fast as a Camaro,and it wil outhandle it......because,well,when you look at the price.....and than compare it to the price of similar performers(Camarocoughcough).....it's hard to take to the Camaro seriously,because it can't fit a Dishwasher in the back like a STI could.  |
STi MSRP - 35k. no options, no leather, no electronics. 35k you get a shell.
305hp
0-60 in 4.8
Lat G's .9
1/4 mile ... 13.5
Camaro MSRP - 31k.
426hp
est. 0-60 in 4.6
est. .94 G's
est. 12's
.....???
where is the competative comparison?
not to mention the Sti may just be the stupidest looking car on the planet.
Edit. maybe you ment the new mustang...
2010 Mustang.
330hp
0-60 in 5.2
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."