View Single Post
Old 10-22-2010, 07:45 PM   #21
PQ
Booooosted.
 
PQ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Supercharged SS
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 36,717
Send a message via Yahoo to PQ
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigearl View Post
Iowa State, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, and Colorado should all be red as well. Just because they're big doesn't mean they're good. Colorado has a 0 carbon footprint football program though- so I'll give them 10 bonus points.

If I'm going to buy your argument, then Alabama is the only one above that really deserves a shot of the three teams shown. Therefore- your point is: only the SEC should get a shot at any bowls.
You're drinking the cool-aid.

Seriously? TT, TA&M, Colorado...... PATSSIE GAMES??? You're reaching HARD. I give you a choice between A&M, Texas Tech Colorado or Toledo in a life or death game you MUST win,,,,, you're taking Toledo or any other of those teams.

Look at Texas A&M, Texas Tech, and Colorados record against the MWC and the WAC. Still dominates their 'pattsie' schedule.

Oh, and Iowa State, could be red as well, but they also have a winning record against the WAC.

And I guess you haven't paid attention to MSU, Ole Miss, Tenessee and Goergia latley.

With the exeption of Iowa State, all the ones you just named have been ranked recently, and all but one, ranked in the top 10.

You'd really put Toledo, and Nevada and the rest of those with Texas Tech, A&M, and Colorado?

Name ONE team other than BSU in the WAC that can say that. JUST ONE. In fact have any of them EVER been for more than a week?

And my 'point' is that college football and the whole system is stupid.
__________________

Last edited by PQ; 10-22-2010 at 08:20 PM.
PQ is offline   Reply With Quote