View Single Post
Old 10-17-2010, 02:58 AM   #68
PQ
Booooosted.
 
PQ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Supercharged SS
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 36,717
Send a message via Yahoo to PQ
Quote:
Originally Posted by motorhead View Post
According to this if you agree with it. There hasn't been any muscle cars for a long time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_car
To clarify the Wikipedia...................

If you're in the group that says the Camaro, Mustang and Challenger is not a muscle car, you are OLD.....................like, in your 30sand 40s DURING the 60's and 70's.

OR, you are excentric......

I was only 5 years old in 1975 and all throuhg my youth my dad had the cars. Nova, Cutlass, yada yada, he always refered to the Camaro AND Mustang as muscle cars. So did all his freinds. And so I have ever since. Ya, I was only a small kid and I'm only 40 now, but I remember the tail end of a good age. And for someone to argue this point is arguing to just appear to know something.

It isn't any more of a valid argument than who was the better football team. Eveyones opinion would differ.

It's laughable to me that anyone would try to difine it to this level....... Dude wrote a book.....???..... must make him the expert and rule maker.





Quote:
Originally Posted by Iroczlover View Post
the muscle cars were the charger, GTO, GSX, Chevelles, Novas, lemays, skylarks.

camaros/Mustangs & Challengers are PONY cars.
Right, because the Nova was soooooo much bigger than the Camaro........

The 5th Gen Camaro is WAYYYY bigger than any Nova.....

So the criteria seems to change to fit an individuals argument.
__________________

Last edited by PQ; 10-17-2010 at 03:14 AM.
PQ is offline   Reply With Quote