Quote:
Originally Posted by TahoeCamaro
For that price, I'd rather just get a CTS-V.
|
I've seen one of these Nissans in person..... I have a client who has one. The looks are no better than Bonnies Lexus......
NOT impressed at all with the styling. No sense of desire whatsoever.
The interior is comperable, but I couldn't get over the generic look of the exterior. Looks like an afterthought.
The paint was amazing though........
NO WAY this car attracts younger drivers. (I'm talking about 30 years and older when I say younger, After all, it is a 55k car)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russo
while i would buy the CTS-V too, you cannot deny that Nissan is making the initiative when it comes with putting the most technology into the car.. GM's answer is to just get a bigger hammer..
|
I like that thinking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3
I'm afraid that, by and large, the only people saying that are the ones who don't actually want what the CTS-V offers and/or diehards for something other than GM and would never actually buy a GM product even if it was the best car for the money. What am I talking about? I'm talking about a car that a car that can be ferocious on the track, yet has a world class interior. A car whose ride quality isn't compromised by its handling.
Put simply, the Cadillac is a genuine luxury sport sedan with room in the back for nearly anyone to sit in and be comfortable, yet with performance that surpasses practically every sedan in the world. The M56 is not. And realistically speaking that limits the M56 to:
a: those who look down on Cadillac and GM
b: people need 1/2" of extra headroom
c: those who don't particularly care about the performance side of sports sedans
|
.................
