10-16-2010, 02:30 PM
|
#7
|
Drives: 85 Vette, 07 Escalade ESV, 03 GMC,
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 927
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by syr74
I'm afraid that, by and large, the only people saying this are going to be those who don't actually need what the M56 offers and/or those GM diehards who would buy the GM product whether it offers what they needed or not. What am I talking about? I'm talking about a car which people older than the age of ten or eleven can ride in the back seat of without evoking five complaints per mile about how cramped they are.
Put simply, the Infiniti is a genuine mid size sedan with room in the back for actual adults to ride and be comfortable. The CTS-V is not. And realistically speaking that limits the CTS-V to
a: those who either don't care what the folks in the back think
b: people with relatively small children, and
c: those would could make due with the coupe but just had to have those extra two doors.
For everybody else M56 vs CTS-V is a non starter.
|
There is a CTS-V Sedan as well as a Coupe! The Sedan was what the poster was referring to? For that price, the CTS-V Sedan is a better car.
__________________
ADM Performance installed and tuned: Maggie, Stainless Works Power LTs, ADM race cai, ADM ZL1 scoop
Whiteside Customs Super Street 2 Package w/ coilovers
BC Racing Coilovers and lowered, Whiteline Bushings & Swaybars
MBRP catback exhaust, ZL1 bumper conversion, Drake billet shifter, Hurst paddles, NLP rear spoiler, OEM GFX, Vis Racing hood, ASA GT5 wheels
|
|
|