01-02-2009, 09:36 AM
|
#111
|
Drives: vrooooom vrooooom
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by garagelogic
I get it and welcome it. Make sure your running in the mid-to-low 10's before you do. 
A link? How about a scale? My car, with no weight reduction of any form, every option but the Shaker 1000 stereo (inc. navigation), a full tank of fuel and a larger, heavier KB supercharger weighs in at 3850lbs. With the upgraded stereo, I could see them reaching 3900lbs, but that at the high end. In either case, it weighs LESS than an auto or a manual SS. At least according to Chevrolet http://www.chevrolet.com/camaro/pdf/...ifications.pdf
So, you could care less? That must mean there is something that impresses you about the car, since you're holding back. 
Just like your played out lines about it's interior. |
Interesting... so... for this to work you'd have to ignore what 'Ford' gives as the lb's for the mustang, claiming they want to hurt their product by listing it at over 3900lbs... but then assume Chevy has more accurate scales for their cars?
Sorry, 
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
|