View Single Post
Old 09-01-2010, 05:43 PM   #26
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOWDOWN View Post
Since Pontiacs were never sold in China, we'll never know, will we? Strictly a GM decision...good, bad, or otherwise...

And ALL these Buicks being sold in China are assembled and sourced WHERE? The direct benefits for North Americans?

GM, being a less-than-50% owner of their Chinese operations (by law!), is therefore making half the money they could/should if that investment was made HERE, per comparable unit, and is forced to reinvest the vast majority of those profits in CHINA to expand operations and engineer to "local" specifics... It's kinda like NUMMI in reverse...

Great corporate policy, a little less so for North Americans, the reason the company still exists...
Answer me this:

How do you figure that it would have been a better business decision for GM to keep Pontiac than Buick? The way I see it, they sold more Buicks with more profit on each of them. That leads to a much higher total brand profit, even when you take away some from their Chinese operations.

I'd love to have a strong Pontiac brand still around. That said, I accept the logic in killing it instead of Buick. If the majority of the sales are for fleet, the brand has no identity anymore, nothing too substantial in the product pipeline, and minimal profit (if any) ... why keep it?
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote