Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1
The camaro didnt get the IRS right when it is neck and neck with the mustang GT while being 250lbs heavier and slower in a strait line?
A camaro is a failure at .1 tenth behind a car that you consider sex on wheels? So what is the mustang then...barely acceptable?
If the driver of the GT in that test had his foot slip off of the pedal you would be ripping on the mustang right now? Again...I am not following your logic.
Just because it doesnt beat the mustang GT doesnt make it a failure. I know you mustang fanboys feel like you are in heaven right now but c'mon...look at the data LOL
The camaros IRS must be the "magician"
BTW...you did nothing in your post to refute my point of the IRS being the better choice...just blindly ripped on the camaro...nice move once again. Remember you said the SRA in the mustang is what makes the difference and thats what we were discussing. Which is totally false BTW. The mustang would be faster if it had an IRS and the camaro would be faster if it lost 300lbs. Everyone seems to understand that except you. |
I agree with this right here.
The IRS in the SS is the best thing to happen to the Camaro honestly. It handle way better then my SRA did in my wondering years (when I owned a 200 Mustang). I get the improved cornering plus I can still whip the rear end around corners like I could with a SRA. Too the mustang has always had a weight advantage over the Camaro, no surprise here, IMO The Camaro is just higher quality in the running gear than a mustang. Always has been again IMO. I will say I am glad to see American muscle has returned. I wish the Challenger didn't look like a Charger or 300C on the inside too but oh well glad to see the Big 3 at it again. Regardless of who is wining stock by .1 of a second. I will forever be in love with any and all camaros.
