View Single Post
Old 08-24-2010, 12:09 PM   #16
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by cab2g View Post
Well now they're replacing them with turbo'd v6 engines or very powerful V6 engines at the very least. I mean when the Charger came out it had 340 HP, now manufacturers are making V6 engines that have nearly the same torque and HP numbers without any turbocharger/supercharger systems. Granted the torque curves on V6 engines typically aren't as fun as the V8's but your average sedan buyer isn't going to test the 0-60 and 1/4 mile times regularly.

With that said, I can't believe they're making another Fast and the Furious. Can't they come up with another movie plot that combines hot babes and cars? Lets be honest, nobody watches the Fast and Furious for the script writing or the storyline...
They might be approaching those power levels, but they're down over 100 ft-lbs of torque. Modern NA V6's have a hard time matching the torque of V8's from 20 years ago.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote