[GrnMchin]

Originally Posted by LarkVille

Yes but if this was the case there would be no car reviews. People do research before they even test drive--and they're bound to hear negative things that will discount one of them.

Yeah it's true though, this was a really amateur hour track to be testing on (all 2nd gear?), and if you've seen his 2011 GT review he's winding through the back woods of SoCal. While I prefer Camaro's powertrain and looks, and have driven both cars, he's mostly griping about driver interface, which I can't handle as well.

Interior-bone stock no options Maro vs stang, the camaro might win but you can upgrade the hell out of the Mustang, aluminum appointments, leather on the side, more color options, metal cue ball shifter, sync nav, actually WORKING ambient lighting, all glass roof option. Too bad they don't have HUD, you know.

True, but in the sentence before that also stated that "were possible" being the key factor.. So some stuff is always going to be purely subjective. I have also found some of the driver interface to be quirky and hope for improvements. With the Camaro being out of the picture for so long Ford has had time to develop the car more and the Camaro w/ time will do the same.