Quote:
Originally Posted by GrnMchin
I think some get bent about one person's review before they look at it from a different prospective. I wouldn't call the review worthless, but more of a piss poor review. A review should be as unbiased and try not to interject your personal preferences were possible. So try to explain the differences about the two cars w/ out using therms that would discount a car before someone has a chance to drive it for themselves (very few reviews I have seen do this for any of the car makers). And lastly don't end w/statements that are way exaggerated just poor reviewing. (50 cars a day really maybe if you count all last gen and new gen mustangs you see on the road, but Camaros I find it hard to believe. Not to say it's not true, but really) All this said adds up to a very low to 0 credibility rating in my opinion and yes like everyone else I got one too...  |
Yes but if this was the case there would be no car reviews. People do research before they even test drive--and they're bound to hear negative things that will discount one of them.
Yeah it's true though, this was a really amateur hour track to be testing on (all 2nd gear?), and if you've seen his 2011 GT review he's winding through the back woods of SoCal. While I prefer Camaro's powertrain and looks, and have driven both cars, he's mostly griping about driver interface, which I can't handle as well.
Interior-bone stock no options Maro vs stang, the camaro might win but you can upgrade the hell out of the Mustang, aluminum appointments, leather on the side, more color options, metal cue ball shifter, sync nav, actually WORKING ambient lighting, all glass roof option. Too bad they don't have HUD, you know.