I think some get bent about one person's review before they look at it from a different prospective. I wouldn't call the review worthless, but more of a piss poor review. A review should be as unbiased and try not to interject your personal preferences were possible. So try to explain the differences about the two cars w/ out using therms that would discount a car before someone has a chance to drive it for themselves (very few reviews I have seen do this for any of the car makers). And lastly don't end w/statements that are way exaggerated just poor reviewing. (50 cars a day really maybe if you count all last gen and new gen mustangs you see on the road, but Camaros I find it hard to believe. Not to say it's not true, but really) All this said adds up to a very low to 0 credibility rating in my opinion and yes like everyone else I got one too...
All the cars are very close and it boils down to some key factors of what you are looking for.. For instance the new 5.0 from what I gather has up its game and tops the Camaro in some areas. I would expect GM and Dodge to now look at how to top the new stang in coming years, but for the Auto manufactures to totally change the car every year would be an financial disaster. To produce a car that was rushed would lead to disaster and be a flop because of it. Ultimately the car manufactures build cars to sell and have to make compromises in areas that they feel will make it a better w/ out missing the mark. If it a closer to a race car feel your looking for w/ out moding then
maybe the new 5.0 does do the better job, but next year there might be a new top dog that one ups the 5.0. I can't afford to change cars every year so I will continue to drive my very stunning Camaro and performance street car, because that's what I like.