Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Blur
It doesn't matter that he ever had any other tail lamps. The court only discusses original equipment. That's the reason the automotive press is discussing the issue. It isn't unusual for aftermarket tail lamps to be ticketed, but for stock ones to be an issue would indicate that a state government is overstepping its bounds.
The reason a link to the decision is unavailable is because the court case is not "Maryland v. Jackalope." The case would include the real name of the person, and that would require us to know who that person is to find the record of it in a reasonably timely manner.
Since you are apparently the only one so concerned with the truth of this matter, why don't you do us the favor of reading all the court decisions from that day and posting the correct one?
|
The only source the article names is a link to a thread that doesn't exists anymore.
I don't take that to be a credible source.