Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1
...Plenty of people (on the massive 30 on the list) on this site alone have run 12's in the camaro, 9 people out of 31 on the list have hit 12's to be exact. 12.58 being the best time (12.43 @ 112 corrected) on a measly 1.94 60ft. Their are also plenty of 111 traps.
|
Correcting 1/4 mile times is great for a racer that likes to compare what he/she runs from day to day, or from track to track (I did it regularly when I competed in the NMRA series a few years ago - kept a detailed log). But correcting them so that you can say on the internet that "xxxxx ran this, but it would have been this on yyyyy day" is rather....well......lame. No offense intended, I simply can't think of a more PC way of putting it. Sorry.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1
As I recall Evan Smith ran a 12.69 at ATCO with the 11 GT. Dont tell me he cant drive....
|
Even Smith went 12.69 at
Gainsville in Florida, not Atco. He certainly can drive.
The quickest bone stock GT I know of went 12.58 (curiously enough) too. However, it will be fall before we see some good times from these cars. There were simply not enough of them out before the summer weather hit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1
I had the pleasure of driving a new GT a couple days ago. I can tell you for certain my car would absolutely WALK AWAY from it.
|
Over a brand new, bone stock GT? I would hope so! Your mods (the ones that actually increase performance):
Stainless Works 2" Long Tubes, Flowmaster AT Cat-Back, Cold Air Inductions CAI, SLP UD Pulley, Hurst Short Throw, RevXtreme Catch Can,
Dyno tuned at Stenod Performance Mustang Dyno
435RWHP 418RWTQ
Given your mods, I'm not sure what your point was in saying that you would "walk away" from a bone stock, extremely low-mileage 2011 GT.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1
The driver mod is probably the most important thing when racing these two cars...
|
I think most folks would agree with that. I know I do.
I hope everyone enjoys their cars - no matter what it may be.