Quote:
Originally Posted by assasinator
1. using 87 octane and reporting dyno number vs. a LS3 with premium is bad.
2. buying a mustang just for running it on a dyno is a waste of money.
3. buying a mustang, making an invalid test , reporting it, and being a biased shop means you will sell nothing to any mustang gt owner.
al least shops like livernois do their best work for every make and model. unbiased.
|
I'll add to what others have said also. They have been up front with everyone on this. They didn't hide the fact that it came with 87 octane and that it wasn't a pure apple to apples comparison. That said, there are SO many threads here that mention testing a car and go weeks and weeks before you see any dyno results or are hard numbers. They keep promising "soon, very soon." but rarely deliver on every step.
I personally think it's refreshing to see a company being so forthright with their info and giving us a step by step update with each and every change. How many dyno pulls do we have to compare the differences that 87 vs 93 octane makes on the same car? I think that's valuable and rare information that we are lucky to get because of IPS's "biased" testing.
As long as a tuner is honest about the details, I will ALWAYS choose to have more information rather than less. They are going to get around to the true apples to apples comparison with high test fuel when the car is ready, but until then, I want to say THANK YOU IPS for giving us all this information that everyone here wants and rarely gets!