Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323
the immaturity level of this response is out of hand.
|
A post calling another post immature is not, in itself, immature. However the petty "editing" is immature.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323
I am just correcting misleading info.
|
No, you are going out of your way to point out the obvious (that being that a poster's comments are his opinion). I am not the King of Earth. I know there is no little gremlin guy printing my word into a bible as I speak it. Anything I say is my opinion, thus it doesn't need to be pointed out.
When the "big 3" muscle cars (pony cars, whatever) came out, they were about being fast, beastly cars that were all but impractical for a family man.
The Camaro and Mustang and Challenger continue that concept today. But for the Charger, it was dropped. When I picture a 400 HP beast of a car, I don't picture a car that a family of 4 can fit comfortably in.
Look at all the reviews of the Camaro, Mustang, Challenger. They almost all knock the back seats and then in the very next sentence they say "But that's not why you're buying a 400 HP muscle car, now is it?"
The new Charger looks like a sedan version of the Magnum. Neither of which scream 'beastly muscle car' to me. Hell, the Charger and the Magnum share the same front end for crying out loud. The Charger should be called the 4-door Magnum, not a Charger. The imagine instilled by the classic Charger is lost in its new namesake.