Quote:
Originally Posted by StuntmanMike
Here's a thought -- Instead of editing my statements, why not make some of your own? Because what you're currently doing makes you look petty and immature.
Here's a fact for you, (since you seem so intent on pointing out that people's statements are opinons -- no kidding, seriously?)
The Charger is heavier than the Challenger -- a car pretty much everyone on this board recognizes as the fattest, heaviest, slowest of the three returning muscle cars. Not only is the Charger heavier than the Challenger, but all but the top trim has less power and torque than the Challenger.
So here you have the Challenger -- a car many on this board say can't even hope to be competitive unless you buy the ridiculously priced top trim level. And then you have the Charger, which is fatter, heavier and slower than a Challenger.
In terms of what people have come to expect from cars like this....what do you call 4th place? I call it garbage.
|
the immaturity level of this response is out of hand. I wont go into it, except go do some research and you will see these so called fattest blah blah (insert childish comment here) are in reality a drivers race. So please dont take it personal, I am just correcting misleading info.