View Single Post
Old 05-07-2010, 03:04 PM   #29
ssump29
LOL at most people here.
 
ssump29's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 GTO,2006 M6, 2007 300 Touring
Join Date: May 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 1,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by meanmike View Post
What he said makes perfect sense. If that engine was in a lighter car such as the Camaro the number's would be better than what they are now. Seem's pretty simple to me.
And you aren't getting it either, the car is what it is and the point being made is its getting the same mileage as a V8 in a camaro. So really where's the benefit to the supposed V6 mileage line they say in the commerical. There isn't one. No need for the woulda, coulda, shoulda so stop bringing that up.

What I said first stands. The comparsion is accurate because that's what the car IS, not what you could do. Simply said its not what you are saying it is.
__________________
Number 5952. oh yeahhhhhhh
ssump29 is offline   Reply With Quote