View Single Post
Old 05-04-2010, 02:47 PM   #4522
snakekiller
 
Drives: f150
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: san diego
Posts: 281
Quote:
Originally Posted by toehead93 View Post
Good article expect two things that bug me. One, the HP output of the 5.0 is not under rated by Ford, it SAE certified. Comparing rear wheel dyno number to prove it is underated is like using a scale to compare a witch to a duck. They also note that the more expensive Camaro doesn't have anything over the Mustang, well once the Mustang has the same belss and whistles like the handling package, larger wheels, and Brembos the Mustnag is more expesnsive. Not to take anything from the Mustang, it is a bad car...I just feel I need to point those two things out. The only thing the Mustnag has over the Camaro is a better diet councilor than the Camaro had in Jenny Craig.
correct, every one is going by inside line
and frankly the numbers were ridicules 390hp..lol
MT and evo-performance number are believable.
i believe the reason why none tested the car in 5th gear
were because, the mustang speed limiter is set at 145, by 5th gear its going
145. Ford should of set the limit higher, specially wen you have a 7000rpm's
snakekiller is offline   Reply With Quote