Quote:
Originally Posted by SGOS252382
I feel styling (looks) far out weigh the other factors. The GT delivers a nice package, but I just flat out don't like the way the car looks. That's huge in my decision about a car being a "good" or "bad".
To me the difference (visually styling/curb appeal) between the Mustang GT and the Camaro SS are night and day.
|
So then performance really doesn't matter? Whenever its one thing the other doesn't matter, so if the Camaro looked like a turd on wheels, but it ran an 11 second quarter mile, then the styling wouldn't matter?
So then if the Camaro looked like something straight out of Pininfarina Design, but had a 3 cylinder Geo Metro motor, then performance wouldn't matter right?
You Camaro fans are so fickle, always bending and twisting things to sway the Camaro into some kind of importance.
Look fact of the matter is, to most people, even magazine editors, the Mustang is the better looking of the two.
And like I said before its the better engineered car, and is better as an overall package.
9 million Mustang owners aren't wrong, and I think you will see that when the V6 sales numbers come out next year.