Thread: rwd vs fwd??
View Single Post
Old 04-09-2010, 03:34 AM   #23
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by a_Username View Post
I know FWD is slightly inferior to RWD, just as RWD is slightly inferior to AWD. I was just defending the fact that a FWD vehicle has managed to outdo similarly-priced AWD/RWD cars, as well as reach 7s in the 1/4 mile. In reality, FWD performance isn't anything to "shake your head at."
I shake my head because for all the effort that gets put into making a fwd car perform, an equal effort put into rwd (or awd) would yeild better results. Its not because I'm under some false belief that rwd is always superior to fwd. Each one has their purpose. And the purpose of fwd is not to deliver performance. With enough work, just about anything is possible. If I trained day in, day out, over the course of months, I could probably do a marathon. But being stuck with a broad frame, short limbs, and heavy build it will take a lot more effort than someone tall and lithe. But I guarantee you that could crush those beanpoles if we were playing rugby. Its a matter of sticking to what you're good at. I'm not good for distance running, fwd isn't good for performance.

I still want to learn more about that 7s fwd Honda, btw.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote