Quote:
Originally Posted by 2SSARMY
He doesn't. He's wondering why motor trend has given worse numbers to the camaro now that the 2011 gt is out, than before. If anything the numbers the SS produces should be the same OR better... not worse.
|
why should they be better? i don't see that logic. 104 ft compared to 108 ft. is BASICALLY the same. So to argue about how it got 105 ft. before doesn't matter. But the magazine had to pick a better of the two, and it did. It's not that serious.
And i believe the mustang would have trapped higher with more correct gearing. The mustang is out of gear at 110-111 mph and has to be shifted into 5th. I don't think it's costing it too much in the time (another ~.1) but the mph would suffer (~2 mph).