Quote:
Originally Posted by v6sonoma
In the end the winner will be what style people like more.
|
I agree with this statement, but it seems Camaro's much-adored styling has already become passe to the MT editorial staff:
Quote:
|
most editors agreed the styling of this car has grown old quickly, or at least it isn't compelling enough to make us forgive the huge penalties the cartoonish proportions exact on the packaging. The Normandy pillbox visibility and redwood-trunk A-pillars make it difficult to look ahead through left-turn apexes, the gauge fonts and location make them hard to read, and the exaggerated and oversized steering wheel rim and shifter make the driver feel small (aren't these cars supposed to do the opposite?).
|
I don't share their opinion, other than the glaring issues with outward visibility compared to its competitors, but its an opinion that is out there nonetheless.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1camaro70
If they test a stock Camaro they should test a stock Mustang, NO track pak that only 10% will have.
|
There is no "track-pack" option on the 2011 Mustang GT, what are you talking about? Less than 10% of Camaro SS buyers opted for a 1SS, should we discount the performance numbers from those cars, too?