Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010 Bumblebee
In the reporters defense the only way you can get a camaro to say RS on it from the factory is with a V-6. The SS can have the RS package but it will say SS. I know RS is an option and not a trim.
That aside, it was a pretty cool video. Did you notice that they pushed the mustang a little harder to make it look like it is better?
First of all ,we the camaros, are the only ones with independent rear suspension of the three. If I'm correct. This alone makes the camaro better.
All three cars look great ! But the challenger is out of date on the inside & the mustang looks good, but looks too small inside & out.
The camaro looks good, handles good, is cool inside and out, it's just a way classier & sexier car !
I always think about buying a challenger or a mustang for another car besides the camaro if I had the money, but both of them just don't do it for me. I like to look at them, but don't desire to drive one.
I was thinking of a 4 door charger like the police cars for daily driver might be nice or a 4X4 chevy silverado.
|
Not exactly true....the challenger has IRS also..and NEITHER are better handling then the mustang which wins hands down in handling across the board..so IRS..and and of itself...does not by any stretch make the Camaro better by de facto ruling...read ANY mustang review or road test and they all agree.
The challenger...having the most faithful to the orginal design of the three..is the best looking to my eye (subjective).
The mustang being the smallest...makes it the best..not the worst via being small. It makes it handle better, more fun to drive, easier to see out of and easier to park.
Have you ever heard anyone use the "yet but your porsche is too small to be any good argument"?..no....because smaller is often/usaully better in any sort of performance argument.