Quote:
Originally Posted by scrming
hmmmm... 13.7 is a quite a bit quicker than I would have guessed... 400 pound difference is about .4 difference in the 1/4 mile... cars have basically the same HP/TQ... I would have thought the Mustang would have been low 14s or high 13s... not 13.7...
Now based on my time slips, I've been kind of wondering if I should have been getting better ETs based on 60' times and trap speeds... really makes me wonder now!
Going to be interesting to say the least!
|
0,96g on the skidpad isnt nothing to sneezed at either....numbers are fantastic....but like the camaro rs and ls you need the bigger package to get mustang gt brakes suspension gearing wheels 255 40 19 which is 2000$ more then the base car....but it handles like a 911 gt3!look at the numbers!its acceleration is the least impressive thing on the list....and the gt gets the job done with 12.8 at 110.8
