Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1
LOL. This guy must be really upset with the test results. Why is he wasting his time here?
I mean all this shit talking with cars producing the same trap speeds and nearly identical 1/4 mile times in the two reviews I have read. Handles like a pig? it is right behind in the tests. And lets see some lap times and not just figure eight test. The camaro was behind in the figure eight before as well but was still quicker at the track.
Whats really sad is that we still have a 6.2 which he chooses to ignore. He is going to need a supercharger (like always) to keep up when the modding starts.
Its also funny how he believes it is under rated with todays SAE certification. Simple dyno discrepancies has this guy jizzing in his pants.
He must be about 17 years old I am guessing LOL
How sad.
|
Actually the Mustang runs .2 quicker in the quarter.
On top of that the 5.0L is going to respond to mods VERY well. And you're right you do have 6.2L. Now if I'm not mistaken the 5.0 puts out more power from less displacement. Like I said before GM engineering is getting old.
And what I'm doing here is payback for all the little Mullets who come on OUR forums and run their mouths. Honestly first you run your mouths. Then the Terminator comes and you complain about a blower. Now this comes and you all say "wait till they throw Corvette parts in 2011". You should probably stop running your mouths.
And if you can't then I'm pretty sure the 5.0 is here to shut you all up.