Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Blur
 The article clearly blasts the Challenger for its underwhelming performance in contrast to the head-to-head Camaro-Mustang battle. They then proceed to identify that the tested Mustang beat the Camaro in every tested category. That's even fair. Identifying the issue of price is really a tough pill to swallow. Of course, GM has appropriate responses to this: - The Camaro has a longer warranty.
- The comparision is roughly a tie between a 2011 Mustang GT and a 2010 Camaro SS.
- GM has not yet released 2011 improvements for the Camaro, so there is still time to beat this Mustang.
This Mustang is a great improvement over the 2010 model. Ford did well there. This is not an outright, undisputed win. It is close enough to fall behind very quickly. Let's also be honest with ourselves. When we go to the track, how many of us are racing stock?  These numbers are a starting point, but they don't represent the performance of our comrades at the track. We'll all be beating these numbers. |
And I dont want to say it to start a war.
But which one has a 6.2 under the hood that is a cam swap away from nearly 500rwhp?
