Quote:
Originally Posted by garagelogic
Back to the topic at hand, you are never going to get everyone to agree that one cars styling is better than anothers. Appearances are completely subjective. What one person finds attractive or beautiful is not going to hold true for everyone. You can argue until you are blue in the face, but you will never be able to convince someone else that they are incorrect for not agreeing with your opinion.
I think that is what we are dealing with here. The Camaro generally gets rave reviews about its styling, but here we have one person who gives the Mustang kudos over the new Camaro and everyone cries foul. Get over it. As it has been stated, most people are in love with the Gen5"s styling, so why make such a big deal over one guys opinion? Go enjoy you car, whatever make/model it might be; isn't that what you bought it for?
|
yeah but the guy based the Mustang's advantage on the 2010 Camaro not having a convertible option. However, he was comparing it to a 2011 Mustang... comparing a 2010 Mustang v6 to a 2010 Camaro v6 there is no comparison even a Mustang fanatic will admit to that, comparing a 2011 Camaro to a 2011 Mustang and the Camaro does have a convertible option. i'm just saying it's not a fair comparison.
the guy writing the article is obviously a very biased Mustang fan, he goes into length about Sync, but doesn't know a damn thing about Onstar, if he thinks the nav feature on Sync is easy to use he obviously has never tried the "directions and connections" feature available on the Camaro... not to mention advanced crash notification, handsfree calling with or without the use of your cell phone, stolen vehicle assistance, vehicle diagnostics or remote door unlocks... on the features and benifits Onstar has it all over sync. calling himself a car expert and attempting to make it seem unbiased is what i don't like about the article.
but... like you said, enjoy the car.