View Single Post
Old 10-02-2008, 02:07 PM   #54
headpunter
Not That sad..considering
 
headpunter's Avatar
 
Drives: Man
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: the part of washington the capital forgot about.
Posts: 3,745
Send a message via AIM to headpunter
Quote:
Originally Posted by porcupinekiller View Post
4.6 liters(engine displacement) + 2.3 liters(supercharger displacement)=6.9 liters!!! Therefore I agree. There is no replacement for displacement.
I had a 1969 428 CJ Mach I years back and I loved the torque of that beast. But my little 281 cui engine with the twin screw on it feels pretty sweet when you nail the go pedal (and it sounds awesome). It pulls hard from 2500 rpm and I only need to shift at 6000 rpm (just like my old big block). It's shown quite a few vintage big block muscle cars its tail lights at the 1/4 mile track.
not as good as 6.2 l + 2.3L = 8.5l........
__________________
headpunter is offline   Reply With Quote