View Single Post
Old 02-03-2010, 02:56 AM   #197
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
It makes perfect sense:

A stuck throttle is a safety issue.
A fail-safe/redundant throttle sensor is not. It is to prevent the safety issue from becoming an...issue.
And I never defined a fail-safe.

The safety engineering should start at the throttle components, and thus make the "fail-safe" components unnecessary. I also said that there are other ways to overcome the issue that toyota is experiencing...only intended as support of my belief that they shouldn't be "made" to do anything.
You don't quite appreciate the importance of a fail-safe. A fail-safe is a design such that when the components fail, they do so in a safe manner. And yes, you should expect components to fail. Murphy's Law of Engineering dictates that anything which can go wrong eventually will (yup, its more than just a joke). Knowing this, you can attempt design critical systems such that there is a safe failure mode, a fail safe.

In the cast of unintended acceleration (regardless of reason, be it from the pedal or internal software glitches), the fail safe is in the programing. If it reads moderate to high throttle and full braking pressure while at a non-zero speed, cut the fuel supply to the engine and shift transmission to neutral (for automatics).
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote