Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBoomKid
I drag race a warmed over 383 '89 Camaro (smog legal in Calif.) 700R4 with a 75 shot of nitrous and no I repeat no overrated gt 500 has come close.
|
Okay, my wife drag races a 393Ws stroker 1965 Fastback and no stock SS Camaro has put up a quarter mile time that even comes close to what that car runs. What's your point?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBoomKid
Magazines have the run the SS Camaro and gt 500 mustang against one another and the average difference is .2 in the 1/4 mile in favor of the gt 500. There's more difference in a driver. For $50K a pop for the gt that money is NOT well spent. Imagine what one can do with $20K on their SS Camaro. A $30K SS Camaro is a steal!
|
Less than 10% of all SS Camaro buyers so far have opted for a 1SS, so it is very unlikely that 90% or more of the owners of modified 2010 Camaro's on the road today paid anywhere near as low as $30K for their car. It's always nice to use the lowest V8 Camaro price in comparison to the highest GT500 price when making that arguement, isn't it?
I will agree, however, that the Camaro offers a better bang-for-your-buck, performance-wise, than the GT500.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBoomKid
I've made few modifications to my SS with more to come and so far gt 500s come in 2nd on regular basis in the 1/4 mile.
|
And I've made a few modifications to my GT500. Wanna line 'em up sometime?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBoomKid
Ford's performance mustangs cannot back up their performance. That's not to say ford mustangs are not fast.
|
