Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3
The 3 cars currently have their own areas of the market. Beyond brand loyalty and styling, the Camaro is the best performing and the least practical. The Challenger is the most practical, yet worst performing. The Mustang is between the two in all regards. So, when you consider the fact that most people will never drive their car to 50% of its capabilities, no matter what the car is, so technically performance limitations are actually less important than how you feel while driving it. The Challenger is intended for those who accept that, and merely want a nice daily driver or cruiser. I don't agree with this choice, but I understand where its strength lies.
|
Assuming this is all true, then why didn't Chrysler make it a "high-volume" car for it to sell more? Since you believe that people would rather want a comfortable daily driver, then the Challenger should have no worry about selling in this market right? Sales sure don't reflect that.