Quote:
Originally Posted by a_Username
Where? It looks good and is only a "good" performer when the average driver is behind the wheel. In comparing vehicles, IE not comparing a driver's ability, the Challenger makes no sense to buy compared to the other two. You get more car for less money, unless you really want to throw thousands of dollars at the most retro look. Obviously, most people don't take the retro choice looking at their sales numbers. Chrysler needs a car that can sell and beat its competition.
|
Its a comfortable car, with better visibility than in the Camaro. It also has a few more features (I think, never bothered to investigate).