Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Blur
Maybe that's what the media wants you to think. Do you really think this is the pinnacle of quality?
Here's a Chevrolet interior of the same year, 1985.
Neither product meets today's standards. That's obvious. At the same time, neither seems all that bad. The media constructed a dialogue that the Chevrolet was cheap, expecting it to fit a higher standard than the Honda. The Honda was cheap, but the press described it as economical, lowering expectations then praising the company for meeting them.
Now, I'll ask: was the Honda really higher quality than the Chevrolet or was the media being unfair?
The only cure for your brainwashing is extended time on Camaro5 and agreeing with everything said by The_Blur.  |
even from that distance shot, it is painfully obvious that the Honda interior is in fact better than the domestic. it's just the ugly truth.