Quote:
Originally Posted by Iwantone2
How about the consequentialist who only sees the "end result". I think the argument I learned in school is:
Person A and person B see dog laying on it's side on the side of the road. They stop and Person A tried to pick it up and by doing so, the dog dies. Person B tells Person A that they killed the dog, therefore they did something wrong. Person A says that they were trying to help the dog, therefore doing something right."
does that help or not even close?  |
actually thats perfect, all my other examples have to do with the way of knowing of hearing and seeing and being told, etc. this is through logic and both make sense but are on two different ends of the good bad spectrum. much appreciated
