How about the consequentialist who only sees the "end result". I think the argument I learned in school is:
Person A and person B see dog laying on it's side on the side of the road. They stop and Person A tried to pick it up and by doing so, the dog dies. Person B tells Person A that they killed the dog, therefore they did something wrong. Person A says that they were trying to help the dog, therefore doing something right."
does that help or not even close?
