Quote:
Originally Posted by PQ
So why do they ignore the legitimate scientists who refute the 'Expert' scientists. Personally I think there are scientists who get funding that they wouldn't get if they were contrary to the money generating "Mad made global warming' theory.
So what's next? Population control? Maybe so, but 10,000 years from now maybe it won't matter anyway.
|
We're about 1,000 years from the next scheduled ice age. 10,000 years from now, the world will look a lot like it does today.
There are a lot of legit scientists looking closely at all of the data.
Man did not make global warming. Man made global warming worse. Sadly, the high-paid fools who disagree with scientific proof are a very loud, politicized majority. Because they are loud, they get equal representation in the media. Because they are politicized, they have the support of very selfish individuals who will ultimately profit from the deaths of hundreds of millions of people nationwide when some nations go underwater, including much of the United States. These consequences are unavoidable.
Basically, man will change the Earth's equilibrium. How much remains unknown. No one can do experiments on proportions large enough to represent the entire world, so all we have is well-supported theory.