Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Blur
I have an answer for you!
How do you think an ice age develops every 11,000 from a trend of warming? What happens is the ice caps melt a little bit, bringing down the average temperature of the oceans. The ocean rises because the melted ice is now part of the ocean. The cold ocean affects weather by creating cooler cold fronts that can reduce temperatures on land and create more sever oceanic weather formations. Have you noticed that hurricanes 20 years ago were less damaging than recent ones? That's because recent ones have more energy resulting from changing weather conditions.
Here's the catch. The world will get warmer anyway. It is natural. It will cause an ice age, cause massive devastation, and exterminate entire species; and then it will go away, creating a near-equilibrium for another 10,000 years or so.
If this happens anyway, why do environmentalists claim that humans are to blame? The answer is more complicated than the question. Basically, humans have introduced new toxins to the world since the mass-industrialization of the world. Every country has factories, and factories are not natural. They create compounds and chemicals that do not occur naturally in the numbers that they now appear. The environmentalists aren't really saying that the warming of Earth is all human. They are saying that humans are making it worse and breaking Earth's equilibrium. We don't know what will happen if we break the equilibrium, and that scares people educated on the subject.
There are people who study Earth for their entire lives. Why is it that some people claim to know it all after watching a single news report? All of us here on the forum should accept that there are experts on a lot of different things here. To my knowledge, no one has come forward claiming to be an environmental expert, yet a lot of opinions have developed based on misinformation inspired by politics more than science. Trust the science. Ignore the politics.
|
So why do they ignore the legitimate scientists who refute the 'Expert' scientists. Personally I think there are scientists who get funding that they wouldn't get if they were contrary to the money generating "Mad made global warming' theory.
So what's next? Population control? Maybe so, but 10,000 years from now maybe it won't matter anyway.