Quote:
Originally Posted by lalometalik
 oh you savvy Mustang fanatics. If that car(Mustang GT) wasnt a ford I would jump right on it 
The fact of the matter is, IMO, there are way too many mustangs out there.
I would gladly jump on slightly slower, heftier Challenger, before I cross over to Ford, just to help even out the odds...
but the Camaro is at the top of my list so no need to come to unnecessary conclusions  |
Hey! Who you calling a Mustang fanatic?
I'm far from one, but I was simply agreeing with the Mustang owners in saying that the Mustang GT will still be quicker than the Challenger R/T...
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSmoked
wow ur dealers are total different then mine lol. i have loads of challangers on the roads, a mix of se,rt's and srt8s. the dealers got nothin. hell i see more challangers than mustangs on the roads. it probly doesnt help that im located were they produce the challanger so getting it aint a problem.
|
Didn't know the Challenger was made in Ontario as well. Well lucky you guys! You produce America's finest muscle cars now!
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323
look the fact is that the 5.5 is an estimate for the auto. There is a guy who just got his auto and is doing 5.3 consistently without the engine broken in.
|
If the 5.5 is an estimate for the auto, then I would hope the manual would be capable of producing, anywhere from 5.0-5.3 seconds... If it does then I'll certainly be proven wrong, but with it's weight, I just don't see it happening. Just gotta wait and see.
I'm definitely not taking Edmund's word on it. I don't think they know how to drive...