Quote:
Originally Posted by bluestang50
Ok i'll start lol.
The new taurus is pretty dang nice but the new malibu is really nice too. It would be cool so the a upgraded malibu of some sort to compete with the SHO. They could call it a Chevelle, but a 4 door chevelle would be a disgrace.
As far as the fusion vs the colvalt I would have to say the fusion wins hands down. The cobalt ss is a fun car for sure but the safety ratings arent the greatest and it could use a redesign. It has been quite awhile since they revamped its looks.
As far as the GT vs SS all I can say is that battle is back and honestly it will be very close and in the real world will probably be a drivers race.
|
First, you didn't blunty say the Taurus is better than the Malibu, but considering your post in the thread that gave you the idea to start this thread...
Why is the Taurus better than the Malibu, but the Fusion is better than the Cobalt? You seemed to base the taurus being better than the malibu because of the SHO's superior performance capabilities, yet the Cobalt SS didn't get the win from you because of its superior performance capabilities?
You're comparing the 2011 GT against a 2010 Camaro? How about comparing the same model year, or I could just say compare the 2012 Camaro against the 2011 GT using your logic.
IMO:
Taurus > Malibu
Fusion = Cobalt
2010 SS > 2010 GT